spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer Crusades spacer spacer
spacer Reformation spacer spacer
spacer Pre-Roman Empire spacer spacer
spacer Emancipation spacer spacer
spacer Post World War 1 spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer Spanish Inquisition spacer spacer
spacer Roman Empire spacer spacer
spacer Late 19th Century Antisemitism spacer spacer
spacer Enlightenment spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer spacer
History Wing Directory Room 1 Timeline Arts

Maps

Primary Resources

Testimonies

Related Topics

Related Links

Teaching Tips

Teaching Resources

Glossary

Sunshine State Standards

History Wing

Passion Plays

Image: Scene from Oberammergau Passion Play 2000.

Image: Scene from Oberammergau Passion Play 2000.

Passion plays depict the crucifixion, trials, and resurrection of Jesus. These plays are created according to accounts of the passion found in the four gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Historically, passion plays have blamed Jews for the death of Jesus. The killing of God is deicide. “His blood be on us and on our children.” (Matthew 27:25) insinuates that Jews are responsible for the death of Jesus and bear collective guilt. Deicide, and the idea of Jewish collective guilt, have led to mass amounts of hatred and abuse towards Jews and are considered underlying causes of the Holocaust.

Since the gospels are a historic document, the opinions of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John about Jewish involvement in the death of Jesus do not necessarily reflect modern day thinking. In 1965, during the Second Vatican Council the Roman Catholic Church issued Nostra Aetate which among other statements officially absolved the Jews of deicide and forming a clear stance against acts of antisemitism. Following the Second Vatican Council most other Christian dominations issued similar opinions. In 1988, the Catholic United States Bishops Committee for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs issued criteria for the presentation of the passion, stating that presentations should not portray Jewish characters in a negative tone, nor imply Jewish responsibility for the death of Jesus.
Antisemitic pamphlet with illustration of ritual murder of a christian boy by a Jew.

Image:Antisemitic pamphlet with illustration of ritual murder of a christian boy by a Jew.

Today, passion plays are performed all over the world and throughout the United States. The most famous of all plays is performed in Oberammergau in Bavaria every ten years. This play began in 1634 and has continued to be performed today by the residents for millions of visitors. Until recent changes were enacted in 1990, and again in 2000, the Oberammergau Passion Play included large amounts of antisemitism. For example, Jewish characters used to appear in horned hats suggesting a link between Jews and the Devil, and Jewish religious officials were portrayed as evil and sadistic.

When Adolf Hitler went to see the play in 1934, he considered it a “precious tool” for his fight against Judaism. To further remove antisemitism, the play in Oberammergau has made acknowledgement of Jesus and his disciples’ Jewish roots, Jesus now appears as a member of the Jewish community. However, the line from the Gospel of Matthew remains with insinuation of deicide intact. While the Oberammergau Passion Play, is biblically accurate to the Gospels, it is still antisemitic in its rendering of deicide contrary to the opinions of churches today.

Photo: Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson's "The Passion." Courtesy of Scott Menchin, New York Times.

Photo: Jesus in Mel Gibson's "The Passion." Courtesy of Scott Menchin, New York Times.

Another controversial portrayal of the passion occurs in Mel Gibson’s movie, The Passion. Jewish and Catholic scholars express concern over the portrayal of Jews in the film due to Mel Gibson’s affiliation with a section of the Roman Catholic Church that rejects the Second Vatican Council. After obtaining an early script, a coalition of Jewish and Catholic scholars formed by the Anti-Defamation League and the Secretariat of Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs of the United States Conference of Bishops determined the script contained elements of antisemitism. Scholars worry that Jews are portrayed in a negative light and may be held responsible again for deicide.

Mel Gibson who has denied the existence of antisemitism in the film, based his script on the Gospels and on the writings of two nuns, Mary of Agreda, and Anne Catherine Emmerich. Both nuns have antisemitism in their writings even alluding to blood libel. Is the power of Hollywood and a declaration of “historical accuracy” encouraging a resurgence of antisemitism and the blaming of Jews for deicide? With antisemitism already on the rise around the world, a breakdown in Jewish Christian relations may increase violence.

As evidence of a further divide between Judaism and Christianity a recent cartoon in the Italian Newspaper La Stampa included an Israeli tank with a baby Jesus asking “Do you want to kill me once more?” Before the release of The Passion, Anti-Defamation League National Director, Abraham Foxman, stated about Mel Gibson: “Here’s a man who appeals to the mass audience, but feels he has to surround himself with a cordon sanitarie of people who back him theologically and maybe ideologically and will stand up and be supportive when the time comes. My request still stands: I would like to see the movie, if it turns out I was wrong, I’ll be the first to say so.”
Image: Courtesy of Scott Menchin, New York Times.

Image: Courtesy of Scott Menchin, New York Times.

With the famous Oberammergau Passion Play toning down antisemitism, it is unfortunate that Hollywood may be encouraging its return.

Corliss, Richard, Jeff Israely, and Jeffrey Ressner, “The Passion of Mel Gibson: His Jesus film is bloody, bold—and in Aramaic,” Time, January 27, 2003, 54-54.

Walsh, Michael, “Oberammergau’s Blood Curse,” Time, June 4, 1990, 89.

Topics for Discussion:

  1. Should the line from Matthew remain in the Oberammergau Passion Play? Why or why not?

  2. Explain how keeping the line from Matthew in the Oberammergau Passion Play forces antisemitism to always be present.

  3. What damaging affects has blaming the Jews for deicide had for Jews and Judaism throughout history?

  4. Why do people continue to believe in Jewish responsibility for the death of Jesus after Christian organizations have officially absolved the Jews?

  5. Is Mel Gibson’s “The Passion” damaging relations between Christians and Jews? Why or why not?

  6. Why are gruesome violent scenes emphasized by Mel Gibson's movie and is this focus on violence increasing violence towards Jews? Given the movie's portrayal of the cruel behavior by Romans, are people likely to be angry with Italians? Why or why not?

—Originally written by Caroline Cobb, Intern
Education Department, Florida Holocaust Museum

The American Jewish Committee provides a resource guide regarding passion plays:
http://www.ajc.org/upload/pdf/AJC_The_Passion_A_Resource_Manual.pdf

Links for Oberammergau Passion Play:
http://www.thelutheran.org/0006/page23.html
http://www.adl.org/Interfaith/Oberammergau/Intro.asp
http://www.passionsspiele2000.de/passnet/english/index_e.html
http://dev.adl.org/Interfaith/passion_theology.asp

Links for articles regarding Mel Gibson’s movie "The Passion":

Note: Some of the following articles are available as Adobe Acrobat PDF files. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view or print the articles.

New York Times reviews of "The Passion":

Adobe Acrobat PDF fileGood and Evil Locked in Violent Showdown By A. O. Scott Published: February 25, 2004. This article discusses the effectiveness of using violence in Mel Gibson's movie.

Adobe Acrobat PDF file Passion' Disturbs a Panel of Religious Leaders by Laurie Goodstein, New York Times, February 25, 2004. An interfaith panel of eight Christian and Jewish clergy members and laypeople who gathered to watch "The Passion of the Christ" on Monday night admitted they had very different expectations [and different responses] for it.

American Jewish Committee News:

Adobe Acrobat PDF file Gibson Film "A Disturbing Setback to Christian-Jewish Relations" February 12, 2004, New York. The AJC's response to Mel Gibson's movie.

ADL's position regarding Mel Gibson's movie The Passion:
Adobe Acrobat PDF fileNew York Times 8/12/2003 article, "ADL Voices Concerns on Gibson's 'Passion'" by Lukas I. Alpert, Associated Press.

Anti-Defamation League (ADL) 8/11/2003 press release:"ADL Concerned Mel Gibson's 'Passion' Will Fuel Anti-Semitism if Released in Present Form"

Mel Gibson’s Washington Power Play by Lloyd Growe
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26264-2003Jul22.html

Mel Gibson’s Martyrdom Complex by Frank Rich
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/03/arts/03RICH.html

Adobe Acrobat PDF fileMel Gibson's Father Says Holocaust Exaggerated by Entertainment AFP, Wednesday, February 18, 2004.

Adobe Acrobat PDF file Mel Gibson Defends Passion of the Christ by Associated Press. Article regarding PrimeTime's interview with Mel Gibson during which the director admits he wanted movie to be shocking and extreme.

Months before Debut, Movie on Death of Jesus Causes Stir by Laura Goodstein
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/02/national/02GIBS.html
http://www.adl.org/Interfaith/gibson_oped.asp
http://www.wiesenthal.com/social/press/pr_item.cfm?itemID=7820
http://www.wiesenthal.com/social/press/pr_item.cfm?itemID=7306


Search | Library Holdings | Related Links | Bibliography | Glossary | Site Map

Frameworks 5.0

Link to Us | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy | Legal Notices

Webmaster at the Florida Holocaust Museum


Send education questions to:

© Copyright Florida Holocaust Museum, 2003;  All rights reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: We make a concerted effort to acquire permission from copyright owners prior to inclusion of material on this site. However, this site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, environmental, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you are a copyright owner who objects to our use of your material for any reason, please inform us of your objection and we will remove your material promptly.

 

 
Florida Holocaust Museum  home page