spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer Florida Holocaust Museum home page spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer Seeds of Bitterness spacer Symbolic Stength spacer Structure of Terror spacer Racial State spacer War, Conquest, Collapse spacer spacer
spacer Mein Kampf spacer spacer Appeasement spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
History Wing Directory Timeline for Room 2 Arts

Maps

Primary Resources

Testimonies

Related Topics

Related Links

Teaching Tips

Teaching Resources

Glossary

Sunshine State Standards

Site Map

The Bauhaus

The Bauhaus was a German school of art that encompassed crafts, design and architecture (aerial view of The Bauhaus). As an artistic movement it coincided with the years of the Weimar Republic, 1919-1933. While traditional schools of art in the Wilhelmine era were conservative and generally hostile to the work of the avant-garde, the Bauhaus was in the vanguard of innovation in every aspect of art from teaching techniques to productions and exhibitions.

Photo: Artists of The Bauhaus, Germany.

Photo: Artists of The Bauhaus, Germany. 1926.

In many respects the Bauhaus artists were the antithesis of the artists of social criticism in that they sought to adapt art forms to modern life. The architect, Walter Gropius, founded the movement in Weimar; by 1923 it had its first major exhibition and between 1923 and 1928, the Bauhaus flourished. In 1925 Gropius had moved the school to Dessau.

 

"Let us therefore create a new guild of craftsmen without the class-distinctions that raise an arrogant barrier between craftsmen and artists!" --Walter Gropius, Bauhaus Manifesto

Photo: Walter Gropius, architect and founder of The Bauhaus, 1883-1969. In 1919 he was made director of the Council of the Arts in Berlin.

Photo: Walter Gropius, architect and founder of The Bauhaus, 1883-1969. In 1919 he was made director of the Council of the Arts in Berlin.

“The ultimate aim of all visual arts,” exclaimed Gropius in 1919, “is the complete building!” He distinguished current efforts of integrating the arts with previous “salon” art that kept arts, crafts, architecture and fine arts segregated. “There is no essential difference between the artist and the craftsman,” Gropius continued. “Let us create a new guild of craftsmen without the class distinctions that raise an arrogant barrier between craftsman and artist! Together let us desire, conceive, and create a new structure of the future, which will embrace architecture and sculpture and painting into one unity and which will one day rise toward heaven from the ha nds of a million workers like the crystal symbol of a new faith.”

As quoted in The Weimar Republic Sourcebook, p. 435

Sarah Miller of the Harvard Busch-Reisinger Museum aptly sums up the scope of work conducted by the Bauhaus and its impact on modern art, architecture and design.

Photo: 03/31/1938-Chicago, IL: Chicago Bauhaus School—in the former home of Marshall Field. Dr. Walter Gropius (lt) and Laszlo Moholy-Nagy on the famous circular staircase with students.

Photo: 03/31/1938-Chicago, IL: Chicago Bauhaus School—in the former home of Marshall Field. Dr. Walter Gropius (lt) and Laszlo Moholy-Nagy on the famous circular staircase with students.
©Bettmann/CORBIS

The Bauhaus was first and foremost an art school, albeit of a new and interdisciplinary kind. All students started with a “preliminary course” aimed at unlearning academic conventions of depiction and fostering a creativity based on the essentials of shape, color, and the physical properties of various materials. It was not a class for mastering any particular medium, technique, or genre, but rather a class for learning to think outside old definitions and rules of art. After passing the preliminary course, students joined a workshop such as pottery, printing, weaving, furniture/cabinet making, metalwork, theatre, typography, or wall painting. In this way, Gropius hoped to train a new generation of artist-designers who would be immersed in the practical and theoretical work of building the environment, shaping everyday life, and modernizing the consciousness of an entire society.

In 1923, the year of the Bauhaus’s first major public exhibition and also the year in which the Hungarian artist Laszlo Moholy-Nagy joined the faculty, the school’s tone shifted significantly. The primacy of “building” and the ethic of social participation remained, but were joined by a new motto: “Art and Technology—A New Unity.” (Gropius joined by Moholy-Nagy, drove this controversial change; some of the early faculty adapted, but several left or were forced out.) From 1923to 1928—the Weimar Republic’s most stable and prosperous years—the Bauhaus solidified itself as a “laboratory of modernity” and achieved most of its lasting legacy, in both design and pedagogy. Emphasis shifted away from Expressionist mysticism and handcraft to new ideals;collaboration with industries of mass production; use of modern industrial materials and technologies; and faith in the capacities of design and technology to shape an egalitarian, humane, and progressive society. According to the Bauhaus, the new obligation of artists, builders, and designers was to put technology to socially responsible, constructive uses and to create new forms that embraced and embodied “the machine age.” In so doing they hoped to impress upon others the ideal of participation in creating a total culture—not merely a politics—of modern democracy.

Sarah Miller, From Modern Art to “Degenerate” Art: German Culture, Politics and the Avant-Garde, 1910-1933 (A Guide to Teaching, Busch-Reisinger Museum Harvard Museum Art Museums, 2002), p. 74.

From 1920 to 1931, Paul Klee taught at the Bauhaus both in Weimar and Dessau. He produced a series of lectures and essays which remain among the most important contributions to art theory in the 20th Century. Although he was a prominent instructor and prolific artist, during his years of teaching at The Bauhaus, German society did not appreciate his work Felix Klee describes the reaction of the German people: "At the Bauhaus we were completely isolated from the rest of the world; even if from 1923 on, people would come to see our exhibitions, it was mainly to poke fun at them....[Klee] had only a small circle of enthusiastic followers, those who could understand him. Not everyone could." From Pædagogisches skizzenbuch (Pedagogical Sketch-Book) 1944, by Paul Klee.

The Bauhaus shared a similar interest with the Blue Riders regarding the thinking of Weimar's left-wing intellectuals including the transcendentalists, but ultimately devoted themselves to German idealist metaphysics. Paul Klee's art embodied the ideals and hope of German metaphysics in sharp contrast to the realities of the devestation caused by World War 1. According to art critic Robert Hughes:

Photo:Paul Klee in his studio

Photo:Paul Klee in his studio
at the Weimar Bauhaus.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Painting:1919, by Paul Klee.

Painting:1919, by Paul Klee.

 

Transcendentalism was the common interest of the painters who formed the Expressionist group known as Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider) in 1910. It was also a deep-set part of Bauhaus thought and practice, for nothing could be further from the truth than the idea that the Bauhaus represented some kind of logic opposed to the world-transforming aspirations of Expressionism. When Kandinsky taught at the Bauhaus, so did a Swiss artist named Paul Klee. And though Klee was not a Theosophist he was, like Kandinsky, devoted to an ideal of painting that stemmed from German idealist metaphysics.


The monument of Klee's obsession with this metaphysics was a singular book, The Thinking Eye, written during his teaching years at the Bauhaus - one of the most detailed manuals on the "science" of design ever written, conceived in terms of an all embracing theory of visual "equivalents" for spiritual states which, in its knotty elaboration, rivalled Kandinsky's. Klee tended to see the world as a model, a kind of orrery run up by the cosmic clockmaker - a Swiss God - to demonstrate spiritual truth. This helps account for the toylike character of his fantasies; if the world had no final reality, it could be represented with the freest, most schematic wit, and this Klee set out to do. Hence his reputation as a petit-maître...


There was a clear link between some of Klee's plant motifs and the images of plankton, diatoms, seeds, and micro-organisms that German scientific photographers were making at the same time. In such paintings, Klee tried to give back to art a symbol that must have seemed lost forever in the nightmarish violence of World War I and the social unrest that followed. This was the Paradise-Garden, one of the central images of religious romanticism - the metaphor of Creation itself, with all species growing peaceably together under the eye of natural (or divine) order."

- From Robert Hughes, "The Shock of the New" (Knopf; Revised edition); August 13, 1991.

Photo: Bauhaus School in Chicago. Marshall Field's former mansion serves as the Bauhaus, a university of practical arts, Chicago, Illinois.

Photo: Bauhaus School in Chicago. Marshall Field's former mansion serves as the Bauhaus, a university of practical arts, Chicago, Illinois.
©Bettmann/CORBIS

The immediate successor to the Bauhaus that was dissolved in 1933 under National Socialist pressure was The New Bauhaus, founded in Chicago in 1937 by La'szlo' Moholy-Nagy (1895-1946). The New Bauhaus later became the School of Design, which in 1944 became the Institute of Design in Chicago.

Next: Weimar Politics

Back: Social Criticism

Related:

bullet

Seeds of Bitterness

bullet

The Establishment of the Weimar Republic

bullet

The Weimar Republic Constitution

bullet

Treaty of Versailles

bullet

Weimar Culture

bullet

Weimar Politics

bullet

Weimar Economy

bullet

Weimar Foreign Policy

bullet

Locarno Pact


Search | Library Holdings | Related Links | Bibliography | Glossary | Site Map

Frameworks 5.0

Link to Us | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy | Legal Notices

Webmaster at the Florida Holocaust Museum


Send education questions to:

© Copyright Florida Holocaust Museum, 2003;  All rights reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: We make a concerted effort to acquire permission from copyright owners prior to inclusion of material on this site. However, this site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, environmental, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you are a copyright owner who objects to our use of your material for any reason, please inform us of your objection and we will remove your material promptly.