spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer Florida Holocaust Museum home page spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer Seeds of Bitterness spacer Symbolic Stength spacer Structure of Terror spacer Racial State spacer War, Conquest, Collapse spacer spacer
spacer Mein Kampf spacer spacer Appeasement spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
History Wing Directory Timeline for Room 2 Arts

Maps

Primary Resources

Testimonies

Related Topics

Related Links

Teaching Tips

Teaching Resources

Glossary

Sunshine State Standards

Site Map

Weimar Foreign Policy

A broad spectrum of the German people opposed the Treaty of Versailles and its “humiliating” terms for Germany. There were three main goals in foreign policy during the Weimar era:

  1. Find a means of rearming Germany—eventually this led to secret negotiations with the U.S.S.R. to arrange for arms and training in secret.

  2. Find a means for scaling down the reparations payments—the reparations were blamed for the economic dislocation of the era and were blamed on the Allies.

  3. Find a means for reestablishing Germany as a member of the European
    Community.

Map: Political realignments of Europe after World War 1. Courtesy of United States Military Academy’s Department of History.

Photo: Walther Rathenau was Jewish and a Liberal republican. He was blamed for many problems with the economy. In particular, the right wing directly accused him of the many currency inflations. On 24 June 1922, Rathenau left home for work in his car. He was assassinated when riders in a passing car threw a hand grenade and shot him with a submachine gun.

In 1922, the Treaty of Rapallo provided for secret negotiations with the U.S.S.R. for the creation of the Black Reichswehr, a secret Army, not permitted in the Treaty of Versailles. Also, with the inflation mounting in the years immediately following the war, efforts were made to resist payments to the French. A widespread boycott against production went into effect in January 1923 when French troops entered the Rhineland, after the Germans defaulted on their reparations payments. These tensions declined in 1924, when the Dawes Plan set forth a scaled down payment schedule.

Photo: Gustav Stresemann, Chancellor of 1923 and Foreign Minister until 1929.

Photo: Gustav Stresemann, Chancellor of 1923 and Foreign Minister until 1929.

Gustav Stresemann, Chancellor for a short time in 1923 and subsequently the Foreign Minister until 1929, was the architect of a foreign policy that ushered in an era of peace and stability. Stresemann, a member of the Peoples’ Party, worked closely with the Social Democratic Party in his tenure as Foreign Minister. He was first and foremost a German nationalist that sought to restore Germany’s place among European nations. To this end, he worked towards the acceptance of Germany in the League of Nations (1926). He was also the principle architect of the Locarno Pact, a series of agreements between Germany and Great Britain, France, Belgium, Italy, Czechoslovakia and Poland, regarding borders with Germany and security issues that had been unresolved since World War I.

Throughout his negotiations he sought to create an international order based on reason and peace. He had no doubt that Germany deserved to be a player in the international arena, but sought to achieve this by working in cooperation with other nations. Thus, in Stresemann’s policy, what was perceived as good for Germany was also perceived as good for Europe.

The writer Thomas Mann remarked on Gustav Stresemann’s policy in “An
Appeal to Reason,” Berliner Tageblatt (October 18, 1930):

Composite photograph of Weimar intellectuals and writers Alfred Döblin (left), Heinrich (center) and Thomas Mann (right). They were later persecuted under the Nazis' antisemetic policies. Courtesy of Sefton Delmer, "Weimar Germany: Democracy On Trial," 1972; p.92-93.

 

The remarkable thing is that he won all sympathy and admiration, this trust and authority, despite the fact that his colleagues, not excepting the French ones, perfectly knew—what was quite obvious—that Stresemann’s policy was the policy of a German patriot and aimed at the very thing that one would have thought most obnoxious to the leaders of the former entente: namely, “to put holes into" the Versailles Treaty and to achieve the liberation and rehabilitation of Germany. They ought to have fought against any success in that direction, and the more he succeeded, the more they should have feared and hated him . . . . If that was not the case, but quite the contrary, the reason is of course that his work for Germany was at the same time done in the interest of Europe, and that at his death, as Lord D’Abernon says, “he left Germany infinitely stronger than when he took the helm in 1923, and Europe comparably more peaceful."

As quoted in The Weimar Republic Sourcebook, eds. Anton Kaes et.al., p. 158.

Photo: Composite photograph of Weimar intellectuals and writers Alfred Döblin (left), Heinrich (center) and Thomas Mann (right). They were later persecuted under the Nazis' antisemetic policies. From Sefton Delmer, Weimar Germany: Democracy On Trial, p.92-93.

Stresemann died in the fall of 1929 while negotiating the Young Plan on reparations. While there was much mourning and ceremony to mark his passing, his right-wing critics swiftly moved away from his conciliatory position to a more aggressive nationalist foreign policy.

Next: Locarno Pact

Back: Weimar Economy

Related:

bullet

Seeds of Bitterness

bullet

The Establishment of the Weimar Republic

bullet

The Weimar Republic Constitution

bullet

Treaty of Versailles

bullet Weimar Culture
bullet

Weimar Politics

bullet

Weimar Economy

bullet

Weimar Foreign Policy

bullet

Locarno Pact


Search | Library Holdings | Related Links | Bibliography | Glossary | Site Map

Frameworks 5.0

Link to Us | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy | Legal Notices

Webmaster at the Florida Holocaust Museum


Send education questions to:

© Copyright Florida Holocaust Museum, 2003;  All rights reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: We make a concerted effort to acquire permission from copyright owners prior to inclusion of material on this site. However, this site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, environmental, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you are a copyright owner who objects to our use of your material for any reason, please inform us of your objection and we will remove your material promptly.