spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer Florida Holocaust Museum home page spacer spacer
spacer spacer
spacer Seeds of Bitterness spacer Symbolic Stength spacer Structure of Terror spacer Racial State spacer War, Conquest, Collapse spacer spacer
spacer Mein Kampf spacer spacer Appeasement spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer spacer
History Wing Directory Timeline for Room 2 Arts

Maps

Primary Resources

Testimonies

Related Topics

Related Links

Teaching Tips

Teaching Resources

Glossary

Sunshine State Standards

Site Map

Art of Social Criticism

Three artists of the Weimar Republic—Otto Dix, Kathe Kollwitz, and George Grosz—cannot be easily classified in one of the artistic movements. As Sarah Miller of the Busch-Reisinger Museum suggests in a recent guide on Weimar art, these three are best classified as artists of social criticism. They witnessed the horrors of World War I and the chaos that prevailed in Germany in the aftermath of war. Their art responded to the conditions of the period, strongly criticizing the militarism of German society, the harsh suppression of German Communists, and the bourgeois values that they observed in the new Republic. In a more pronounced fashion than the Expressionists, these three used the human body as a means of representing qualities of the body politic. They did not hesitate to criticize the existing government and society. They intended to reach large audiences so most of their works were prints that were inexpensive to produce and distribute.

Print: Machine Gunners Advancing, Otto Dix, 1924. Print:The Survivors, Kathe Kollwitz, 1923. Lithograph: The Hero, George Grosz, 1936. 16" x 11 ½". Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Robert Roth to Arizona State University Art Museum.

Print: Machine Gunners Advancing, Otto Dix, 1924.

Print:"The Survivors, War Against the War",
("DIE UEBERLEBENDEN, KRIEG DEM KRIEG"), Kathe Kollwitz, 1923. Published by the International Federation of Trade Union Amsterdam.

Lithograph: The Hero, George Grosz, 1936. 16" x 11 ½". Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Robert Roth to Herberger College of Fine Arts, Arizona State University Art Museum.

Otto Dix came out of a working class background. In his early twenties he volunteered for a machine gun unit in World War I. His prints reveal the negative ugly side of war: he saw no glory in war and its “heroes.”

Kathe Kollwitz was in her early fifties when World War I ended. She lost her son Peter at the beginning of World War I. Having lost faith in Germany, she briefly was attracted to the Communist Revolution. She soon became disillusioned with Communism and devoted her work to promoting the ideas of pacifism.

George Grosz (1893-1959 was best known in the Weimar Era for his biting satiric prints depicting the ugliness of Berlin society and culture. On several occasions he was fined for his criticisms of society, the military and Christian values and the bourgeoisie in particular. For about a year he was a member of the Communist Party, but even after he left the party in 19923 he continued to consider himself a propagandist of the social revolution. Among the most well-known of his works were: The Face of the Ruling Class (1919), Ecce Homo (1922), Mirror of the Bourgeoisie (1924) and Love above All (1931). Otto Friedrich recalls the essence of Grosz’s works that so offended the ruling elites:

Painting: George Grosz. Self-Portrait, Warning. 1927. Oil on canvas. 98 x 79 cm. Galerie Nierendorf, Berlin, Germany.

He [Grosz] was enormously productive, creating hundreds of vivid portraits of Berlin and its citizens—all without exception, portraits of decay, corruption, lewdness, death. They do not, of course, give a really comprehensive picture of the city. There seem to be no workmen in Grosz’s Berlin, no schoolchildren, no parks or trees. There are no pretty girls, just apathetic whores, or matrons with sagging breasts, who stand and wait for paunchy husbands in suspenders and underwear to finish brushing their teeth. There is nobody, as a matter of fact, who looks as young and eager and cleancut as Grosz himself, only middle-aged businessmen with bristling mustaches and bald heads and thick cigars; and officers with monocles and ruthless jaws, and, often no trousers; and, over and over again, sex murderers, real or potential, brandishing knives and hatchets. Even the buildings of Berlin become sinister in Grosz’s drawings, hard towers of stone, usually tilted at threatening angles. And there is rarely any sunshine, just the pale light of a crescent moon glowing thinly outside the apartment house where some horror is occurring. And yet, despite their savagery, despite their obsessive repetition of the themes of lust and corruption, Grosz’s paintings are fearfully accurate. They may not represent all Berliners, but those figures of hatred did walk up and down the streets of Berlin in the 1920’s, and in the days of Hitler. One can tell because one can see them on the streets of Berlin today.

Grosz immigrated to the United States shortly before the Nazis came to power. He remained in New York until 1958 when he returned to Berlin. He died in an accident just six weeks after his return.

Next: The Bauhaus

Back: Dadaism

Related:

bullet

Seeds of Bitterness

bullet

The Establishment of the Weimar Republic

bullet

The Weimar Republic Constitution

bullet

Treaty of Versailles

bullet

Weimar Culture

bullet

Weimar Politics

bullet

Weimar Economy

bullet

Weimar Foreign Policy

bullet

Locarno Pact


Search | Library Holdings | Related Links | Bibliography | Glossary | Site Map

Frameworks 5.0

Link to Us | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy | Legal Notices

Webmaster at the Florida Holocaust Museum


Send education questions to:

© Copyright Florida Holocaust Museum, 2003;  All rights reserved.

FAIR USE NOTICE: We make a concerted effort to acquire permission from copyright owners prior to inclusion of material on this site. However, this site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, environmental, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. If you are a copyright owner who objects to our use of your material for any reason, please inform us of your objection and we will remove your material promptly.